Enmon through the eyes of the CEO · owner

You run everything by numbers.
Energy was the exception.

Sales has a CRM, production has OEE, finance has an ERP, and the second biggest cost after payroll runs on gut feel and last year’s invoice. This page walks through the questions you ask as a CEO, and how fast you get the answers.

2nd biggest
cost after payroll, and the last one run without data
21 days → instant
the time from a board question to a substantiated answer
1 screen
instead of three meetings, the same numbers for you, the CFO and operations
The board meeting · model situations

Five questions that have no answer today

Ask them. For each you will see what happens without data, and with it. The difference is not the people. The same people answer in both cases.

⏱ answer in 21 days

“We’ll look into it. Probably prices… and it was cold.”

An action item for the next meeting. Three weeks later a spreadsheet nobody trusts arrives, and the discussion starts over, about the numbers, not the decision.

✓ answered on the spot
Contract prices+11 %
Higher production+4 %
Faults and waste+3 %

The breakdown is ready before the meeting ends, and those 3% can be removed right away. The discussion is about action, not blame.

⏱ no answer

“You can’t compare that, every shift is different.”

Today this question cannot even be asked, nobody meters the shifts separately. The difference exists, nobody sees it. And you cannot enforce a standard that does not exist.

✓ answered on the spot
Morning shift100 (baseline)
Night shift+15 %

The data shows why, too: compressors and extraction run through breaks that the morning crew switches off. The best shift becomes the standard, enforceable, because measured.

⏱ answer: “we’ll find out”

“Who does it actually apply to?”

The directive applies from 2026 to buildings with systems above 290 kW; from 2030 the threshold drops to 70 kW. Finding out whether it applies to you starts only with the first inspection.

✓ met as a by-product
Continuous consumption monitoring, runningEvaluation and measures, documented in the systemReporting, one click

Whoever manages energy for the sake of costs meets the obligation as a by-product, without a last-minute “compliance” project.

⏱ an answer you don’t want to hear

“We lose ten years of data and spend a year finding our feet.”

Measurement history, portal passwords, calculation logic, all in one person’s spreadsheets and head. Company know-how with a two-month notice period.

✓ a staffing change, not a crisis

Data, history, contracts and calculation logic live in a system with an audit trail. A successor finds their way in days, and the departing colleague hands over access, not a binder.

Incidentally, the same works in reverse, the energy manager can take a holiday. A detail that looks good in the job ad for their successor.

⏱ answer in 6 weeks

“We’ll start collecting the documents…”

A hunt for numbers across accountants and facility managers. Estimates end up in the questionnaire, and the customer substitutes a conservative average that costs you in the rating.

✓ export the same day

Measured consumption, emissions and year-on-year improvement leave from one source of truth. Energy efficiency backed by data is a competitive advantage in a tender, not a checkbox.

The full mechanics are on the ESG manager page.

The numbers in the answers are model figures, the mechanism is not. The “why does the morning shift use 15% less” question comes from production directors’ own materials: the difference between shifts exists in most operations, it just goes unseen without metering.
The director’s three levers

Payback. Costs. Asset value.

Data-driven energy management is not about kilowatts. It is about three numbers you watch as a CEO anyway, you finally get the evidence behind them.

Payback on energy investments
within 2 years
the solution itself, with active use

And every further investment (PV, compensation, LED, retrofit) is measured against baseline: payback is a number in a report, not a promise in a deck. CAPEX is ranked by data, not by who presents loudest. The calculator flips it your way: you name the payback you want, and it returns the investment ceiling.

Calculate the investment ceiling →
Cutting operating costs
4–15 %
typical savings with no technology investment

Operational optimisation, uncovered faults and invoice errors. Real findings from our references: a heated ramp running all summer at 50–80 thousand per winter, a tank heater running after a fault at 20,000 a month, reactive-power and reserved-capacity penalties. Small things nobody sees without metering, and which add up to margin.

Findings from practice →
Building portfolio value
5,5 → 5,0 %
the model effect of substantiated data on a loan rate

A building with measured, falling energy intensity is better collateral, a better ESG profile and a higher sale value, and will not end up a stranded asset when the EPBD tightens. Banks respond to data, not promises: the refinancing mechanics are drawn out on the developers page.

How data lifts value →
All three numbers stand on the same foundation: measured data instead of estimates. That is why monitoring is the place to start, the first step towards all three levers at once.
Monday 8:00

One screen instead of three meetings

A CEO does not need another system to log into. They need everyone in the meeting looking at the same numbers.

Before: the CFO’s report, a month oldBefore: a gut feel from operations, “it’s running”Before: the energy manager’s Excel, version v7_FINAL
Enmon, company overview · model data
Costs this month
−2% vs. plan
€72k · by cost centre
Active alerts
2
warehouse dehumidifier (being fixed) · compressor B after shift
Worst site
Hall B
+12% per unit of output vs. Hall A, same technology
ESG readiness
100 %
data complete · bank and customer questionnaires in 1 export
The CFO, the COO and the energy manager see the same screen, no more meetings spent half an hour arguing whose number counts. Whoever wants detail clicks through from a tile down to a specific meter.
What the CEO gets

Data instead of guesses. Even where there was none.

Enmon does not add another system to manage. It fills the last blind spot of a company you already run by numbers.

Margin under control

Active management alone typically saves 4–15% of energy costs, no investment. In energy-intensive operations that difference shows in product margin.

Risks that don’t surprise

The EPBD obligation, a key person leaving, a tender with an ESG condition, a price jump, all known quantities with data, not black swans.

A company, not individuals

Energy management stands on a system with an audit trail, not one person’s spreadsheets. It scales with the company, another hall or branch is a row, not a project.

0×

smaller than its competitors, yet winning contracts thanks to data, a real reference

0

branches in 3 countries run by one client in one system, it scales

0 years

is our longest partnership, this is not a one-season supplier

0 years

payback with active use, calculated, not promised

First-hand

Directors who already did it

11× smaller, and winning

A plant 11× smaller than its competitors kept winning contracts thanks to data, today that means 50% energy self-sufficiency and a 21-year partnership with PKV. And a logistics operator scaled one system to 18 branches in three countries.

You can have the answers at your next board meeting

It starts with an operations screening, meters, invoices, contracts. The first month of data means the first meeting where decisions replace arguments.

CZČeštinaENEnglishSKSlovenčina