ESG decides your loan rate and tender position.
Answer with data, not estimates.
A loan questionnaire. A tender questionnaire. A parent-company request. ESG now decides financing and contracts, and this page walks through the data you answer with: collection, the number for the bank, the promised trajectory, the supply chain and questionnaire season. Always before and after.
48 metering points. The customer’s questionnaire due in 14 days.model demo
Your biggest customer sent an ESG questionnaire, no answers, no place in the next tender. Except you do not own the data: it sits with accountants, facility managers and suppliers. Watch the grid fill. Or not.
What is our carbon footprint? Depends who counts.model example
When emissions come from spreadsheet estimates, every file version gives a different number. But that number goes into the bank’s questionnaire, and without evidence the bank assumes a conservative profile. With a rate to match.
The emissions lottery, try computing the footprint more than once
One number, and the whole path to it
When do you learn you fell off the curve?model demo
The reduction trajectory is a promise, to the bank in the green-loan covenants, to the customer in their Net Zero programme. An operation does not fall off it in January at reporting time. It falls off on a Tuesday in March. The question is when you see it.
The curve gets drawn once a year, in hindsight
Point by point, and an alarm the moment of deviation
March: Building Gama fell off the trajectory, cause: cooling. Fixed the same week.You are your customer’s Scope 3model demo
Automotive, big e-commerce and corporations count your emissions in their reports. Send estimates, and they will substitute a conservative sector average that you pay for in the supplier rating. The same pie, twice.
A pie with a hole: 58% of emissions is extrapolated
Every operation its own slice, from submeters
Questionnaire season: bank, customer, parentmodel demo
The bank in March, the key customer in June, the parent company in September, all wanting almost the same thing, each in a different table. Scores are lost not to operational performance but to unverifiable data.
One questionnaire = six weeks of hunting
The same questionnaire, in one export
From data collector to decarbonisation strategist
When collection, calculation and evidence run themselves, you get time for what you are paid for: deciding where to send capital so emissions actually fall.
A questionnaire in an afternoon
Bank, customer, parent company, investor, every questionnaire draws on the same source of truth. You check and send, instead of collecting for six weeks.
A decarbonisation-curve alarm
When a building falls off the trajectory, you learn it that month, with the probable cause. A stranded asset shows up in the data, not in the sale price.
CSRD as a by-product
When data flows for the sake of contracts and financing, compliance is a by-product: CSRD, ESRS E1 and the audit stand on the same numbers. No second project, no second budget.
source of truth for every questionnaire, bank, customer, parent, audit
of values with an audit trail, who, when, from where, by what methodology
data granularity for real-time Scope 2, no January extrapolations
wherever there is a meter, and every remaining estimate honestly flagged
ESG decides tenders
We know customer pressure first-hand
What e-commerce customers’ ESG pressure looks like, and one-click tender documentation, we show on the logistics page. And how emission data feeds into building value and refinancing, on the developers page.
When the next questionnaire arrives, you answer by Friday
It starts with a screening of data sources, meters, invoices, BMS. The next questionnaire from the bank or a customer you fill from one source of truth. And CSRD? A by-product.